Journalist & editorial consultant

Archive for 2011|Yearly archive page

My best read stories of 2011

In /Random, Business, Media, Personal on December 20, 2011 at 10:46 am

My ICT skills development and retention article was the best read feature on ITWeb for 2011.

My most popular item on TechCentral – a review of Mark Romanek’s Never Let Me Go – was the fifth most read story on the site for the year.

TechCentral review: Conan the Barbarian

In Entertainment, Movies on August 29, 2011 at 9:45 am

My review for TechCentral this week is Conan the Barbarian:

 Under its slick special effects and art direction, Conan is near-incoherent, and for a film with so much violence, surprisingly bloodless. For the all the money that was obviously thrown at this production, there clearly wasn’t budget for a scriptwriter that understood plot and dialogue….

The comparison that seems unavoidable is with HBO’s dark fantasy TV series Game of Thrones, which also features [Jason] Momoa as a nomadic barbarian. Game of Thrones has high stakes and memorable antiheroes, but Conan trades in sloppy contrivances and dull stock characters.

Read more at TechCentral

TechCentral review: Retribution

In Entertainment, Movies on August 22, 2011 at 7:48 am

[Retribution] is the sort of movie that SA filmmakers should make more of rather than throwing tens of millions of rand at expensive and uncertain prospects like Jock and Spud… Shot in just 14 days and financed by the National Film & Video Foundation and private equity, the film illustrates that local filmmakers can make a high-quality product with a minimal budget. No washed-up international stars, no 3D visuals, no crowd scenes — just a decent script, a simple setting and a handful of proven SA actors.

Read more

TechCentral review: Rise of the Planet of the Apes

In Entertainment, Movies on August 12, 2011 at 7:32 pm

Rise of the Planet of the Apes has more heart and intelligence than its B-grade premise and awkward title suggest. At its heart, it’s a classic Promethean tale in the mould of Frankenstein. But it has an underlying poignancy in its first half that you don’t often find in a Hollywood blockbuster as it sketches out the relationships between its apes and its humans.

Read more

Is Mario standing on a burning platform?

In Consumer technology, Gadgets, Gaming, Uncategorised on August 11, 2011 at 5:46 am

In the latest sign of the Applecalypse, Japanese investors and analysts are urging Nintendo to do the unthinkable: make games starring its famous characters for mobile platforms and social media services rather than keeping them exclusive to its own hardware.

This comes as Nintendo struggles to create interest in its 3DS console in a market that appears to be doing a lot of its mobile gaming on tablets and smartphones. Apple in particular is turning the gaming industry inside-out the same way it did the smartphone and music markets, without this even being a major goal for the company.

3DS device sales have been so slow that Nintendo has been forced to apply price cuts of as much as 40% in some markets to move the hardware. Perhaps for the first time ever, Nintendo is swallowing a loss on each hardware unit it sells to get a new console into the market.

There are many reasons for the 3DS’s disappointing performance – a lack of interest in its 3D gimmick, a dearth of good games, a high launch price – but the competition from tablets and smartphones looms largest among them.

The biggest challenge for Nintendo lies in the way that iOS games are changing the economics of the gaming industry. In much the same way as the 20 cent arcade games of the past, iOS games are quick and dirty distractions that often cost a US dollar or less. iOS games also cost very little to make.

Should Nintendo take a leap of faith?

With the 3DS, retail games sell for $40 up and cost developers millions of dollars to make. Many casual consumers are happy enough to play Angry Birds or Cut The Rope in a waiting room or on a train rather than buying $40 for the latest Mario platformer and a couple of hundred dollars for the machine to play it on.

The market for a Mario or Zelda game made at great expense is a sliver of the size of the market for Angry Birds, which has been downloaded some 200 million times. Today, the next hit is as likely to come from three guys in Finland as it is from one of the major publishers with its marketing muscle and army of developers.

Nintendo’s reluctance to create software for other platforms is understandable. Uniquely among the current console makers, it was the only one that made a profit on each unit of hardware it sold from launch day. It probably doesn’t want to sell its games for $1 or even $5 a pop, either.

And Nintendo probably isn’t blind to the fact that Sonic creator Sega is a shadow of itself since it quit the hardware market to focus on making games. It faces a major challenge navigating this changing market, but it has reinvented itself more than once in its 120-year history. It may a find a way out.

But this is a battle that has ramifications for the gaming industry way beyond Nintendo’s stock price. As Tom Bissell puts it, we are seeing a contest between the gamey-game so popular on iOS devices and the big-budget game as cinematic experience or multiplayer sport.

At the moment, the game-as-game is winning out. The other console-makers and big games publishers will need to think about how they will respond. Many gaming industry veterans believe that the rise of tablets and smartphones spell doom not only for handheld consoles but for home consoles as well.

Phil Harrison, a former high-ranking Sony executive, goes as far as to say that Apple will completely dominate the games industry in 10 years’ time if present trends hold. Already publisher Electronic Arts (EA) reports that the iPad is its fastest growing platform.

Consoles once accounted for 80% of EA’s revenues – today they account for only 40%. And with the iPad, EA is able to knock out games every 90 days compared to the multi-year development cycle for big console game like Dead Space or Mass Effect.

Little wonder that EA is betting big on the casual market with moves like its acquisition of digital crack factory PopCap for more than $1.2 billion. Does this mean that the blockbuster game is doomed? Perhaps not, but its market will be smaller and more homogenous.

Casual games compete with the big-budget Triple AAA games like Call of Duty or Halo in the same way as YouTube videos compete with Hollywood blockbusters. They’re jostling for the consumer’s limited time and money, but both will find a market. The yearly dose of Halo or Call of Duty will probably be safe for a while, but expect to see far fewer riskier mid-tier titles such as Enslaved or Shadows of the Damned or even Bulletstorm, which have long been under threat from rising development costs.

The other possibility is that quality and cost of smartphone and tablet games will ramp up as competition becomes fiercer and mobile processing power grows. Something similar happened on the Xbox Live Arcade, which started out with cheap and nasty ports of games like Frogger and today hosts games with expensive production values. Examples are Shadow Complex and Lara Craft: Guardian of Light.

Perhaps we’re already seeing this happen with iOS titles like Epic’s Infinity Blade and Id Software’s Rage HD. After all, the market for $1 marble rolling games and physics puzzlers can’t be infinite, can it?

TechCentral review: Captain America

In Entertainment, Movies on August 7, 2011 at 1:49 pm

My Friday review for TechCentral’s After Hours section this week is about the latest Marvel Comics movie, Captain America: The First Avenger.  

Despite the fact that the Captain is one of the less complex and interesting characters in the Marvel universe, director Joe Johnston has fashioned a rollicking, pulpy action film from his origin story.

Read more

Introducing my web site

In /Random on April 22, 2011 at 9:15 am

I have set this site up to introduce myself and showcase some of my work.

I’ll also blog here from time to time.

Check out my profile and some of my recent work for more information about me.